Share on Facebook
Share on X
Share on LinkedIn
By Zachary Pearlman
Law Clerk

In Fernandez v. Berkeley House Condominium, Inc., the Florida Third DCA addressed whether a contractor who missed the 60-day deadline to file a lien foreclosure action could still pursue recovery under an equitable theory of unjust enrichment. The answer: yes.

Fernandez, through his company First Response, performed work for Berkeley House but was not paid in full. He filed a claim of lien, and the association responded by recording a notice of contest, which triggered the 60-day deadline under Chapter 713, Florida Statutes, to file suit to enforce the lien.
Fernandez missed that window.

Instead of seeking lien foreclosure, First Response filed a claim for unjust enrichment. The trial court granted summary judgment for Berkeley House, holding that Fernandez’s failure to timely file under the lien statute barred all related claims.

The appellate court reversed.

It held that Chapter 713 does not extinguish other remedies merely because the lien rights expire. A contractor who fails to perfect a lien under the Construction Lien Law may still pursue alternative causes of action — including unjust enrichment or breach of contract, where applicable.

The court also rejected the argument that allowing such a claim would undermine the purpose of the lien statute. Florida law explicitly provides that the lien statute does not abrogate other legal rights — it simply creates an additional remedy.

Takeaway: If a contractor misses the deadline to enforce a lien, that doesn’t mean all legal remedies are lost. Claims in equity — like unjust enrichment — may still be available, so long as they are independently viable. Trial courts should not read Chapter 713 as foreclosing other theories of recovery.

At Boatman Ricci, we help contractors, subcontractors, and owners navigate the nuances of lien law — and pursue all available legal and equitable remedies.

* * * * * * * * * *

THIS BLOG IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE. THE READER SHOULD CONSULT WITH KNOWLEDGEABLE LEGAL COUNSEL TO DETERMINE HOW APPLICABLE LAWS APPLY TO SPECIFIC FACTS AND SITUATIONS. BLOG POSTS ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AT THE TIME THEY ARE WRITTEN. SINCE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE LAWS OR OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES MAY HAVE CHANGED SINCE PUBLICATION, PLEASE CALL US TO DISCUSS ANY ACTION YOU MAY BE CONSIDERING AS A RESULT OF READING THIS BLOG.

About the Author

Zachary Pearlman, originally from Rockland County, New York, earned his Bachelor’s in American Studies with a focus on the Colonial Era from Ramapo College of New Jersey and interned in the Chambers of Hon. Sandra Sciortino at the New York Supreme Court, Orange County. Currently a 3L at Ave Maria School of Law, he holds a Rewarding Excellence Full Tuition Scholarship, serves as the Managing Editor of the Law Review, and received the Spring 2024 CALI Excellence for the Future Award in Trial Advocacy. Additionally, he is the president of the Saint Thomas More Society, Vice President of the Legion of Mary, and enjoys reading, watching movies, exercising, and bible study.