Share on Facebook
Share on X
Share on LinkedIn
By Daniel Buley, Esq.
Associate Attorney

In Font v. The Homes at Sheridan Ocean Club Homeowners’ Association, Inc., 51 (Fla. 4th DCA July 15, 2026), the Fourth District held that a prevailing party attorney’s fee provision was not broad enough to allow recovery of attorney’s fees incurred litigating the amount of fees.

What happened:
After prevailing in litigation, the homeowners’ association sought attorney’s fees under both its Declaration and section 720.305(1), Florida Statutes. The trial court awarded not only the fees incurred enforcing the Declaration, but also the additional fees incurred litigating the amount of those fees.

The Fourth District reversed that portion of the award.

The court explained that Florida follows the general rule that parties cannot recover “fees for fees” unless a statute or contract expressly authorizes it. Here, the Declaration authorized fees only in actions brought to enforce the Declaration. That language was too narrow to include fees incurred litigating the amount of attorney’s fees.

Why it matters (for trial lawyers):

Florida courts strictly construe contractual attorney’s fee provisions.
The general rule is that attorney’s fees incurred litigating the amount of fees are not recoverable.
To recover “fees for fees,” the contract must contain language broad enough to expressly authorize that recovery.

Takeaway:
Before seeking “fees for fees,” carefully review the contractual fee provision. A prevailing party clause alone may not be enough.
When it comes to attorney’s fees, every word matters. Courts will enforce the language the parties agreed to—not expand it.

* * * * * * * * * *

THIS BLOG IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. IT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE. THE READER SHOULD CONSULT WITH KNOWLEDGEABLE LEGAL COUNSEL TO DETERMINE HOW APPLICABLE LAWS APPLY TO SPECIFIC FACTS AND SITUATIONS. BLOG POSTS ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AT THE TIME THEY ARE WRITTEN. SINCE IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE LAWS OR OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES MAY HAVE CHANGED SINCE PUBLICATION, PLEASE CALL US TO DISCUSS ANY ACTION YOU MAY BE CONSIDERING AS A RESULT OF READING THIS BLOG.

About the Author

Daniel Buley, a Connecticut native, earned dual Bachelor’s degrees from the University of New Haven and a Juris Doctor from Roger Williams University School of Law in 2013, where he received multiple awards. After practicing criminal, family, and habeas law in Connecticut, he joined Liberty Mutual as a trial attorney, handling over forty trials in liability cases. Moving to Florida in 2021, he worked as a Complex Bodily Injury Adjuster before joining Boatman Ricci in 2025 to focus on civil litigation and personal injury. He lives in Naples with his wife, Marinela, and children, Aidan and Jacob, serving as a church prayer team member, teacher, and marriage counselor.